Book a treatment

Artificial sweeteners and cellulite

Do artificial sweeteners cause cellulite?

LipoTherapeia: Check our advanced skin tightening, phototherapy and cellulite treatments in London, based on the best technologies in the world and on more than two decades of experience over more than 20,000 sessions

To prevent and reduce cellulite, get rid of the sweet stuff altogether

Sugar consumption today is one of the most important causes of cellulite - as well as diabetes and obesity.

Therefore reducing or eliminating sugar:

  • in all its forms (including honey, brown sugar, maple syrup, agave syrup and other sweeteners erroneously thought to be “good sugars”)

  • and everything made with it (cakes, ice-cream, cookies etc)

…is the number one priority for cellulite prevention and reduction, as well as weight maintenance.

But what about sweeteners, artificial or natural? Do they affect weight/fat levels and, consequently, cellulite?

The fact is that most artificial sweeteners, such as aspartame and sucralose have been implicated into various adverse health effects - and even weight gain, rather than weight loss. But most importantly, they definitely do not help with weight loss.

This means that, although sweeteners offer a calorie-free substitute to sugar, they eventually fail in reducing (or even maintaining) overall calorie intake and consequently body weight.

As this study, referenced at the end of this article, puts it:

“Human meta-analyses have reported that artificial sweeteners have no effect on body weight or glycemic control.

However, recent studies have shown that artificial sweeteners affect glucose absorption in the intestinal tract as well as insulin and incretin secretion in humans and animals.

Moreover, artificial sweeteners alter the composition of the microbiota and worsen the glycemic control owing to changes in the gut microbiota.

The early intake of akesulfame K was also shown to suppress the taste response to sugar.

Furthermore, a large cohort study showed that high artificial sweetener intake was associated with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular risk, coronary artery disease risk, cerebrovascular risk, and cancer risk.”

Weight gain, cancer, heart disease? Not very good news at all.

Stevia, glucose, insulin, appetite and cellulite

Furthermore, natural sweeteners, such as stevia, also affect glucose, insulin and appetite and are not as innocent as many people think.

One study (referenced at the end of this article) has shown that stevia:

  • Increases glucose after consumption

  • Increases insulin by 50%

  • And decreases appetite 60 minutes after consumption and then significantly increases it one hour later

Not good news at all either.

Personally I tried stevia a couple of decades ago for a few years and have realised that on top of the horrible metallic aftertaste (and how do you get rid of that artificial sweetener aftertaste?), it always gave me hypoglycaemia and then increased hunger, exactly as research has shown.

Anything that plays havoc with your glucose and insulin levels, making them to fluctuate too high or too low, is just not a good, long term, viable, healthy option.

Stevia was the next big thing 20 years ago but now it’s dead as a viable healthy sweetening option.

How about xylitol and sorbitol?

Xylitol and sorbitol are not viable alternatives either as they taste metallic and artificial and cause intestinal upset in most people, including diarrhoea.

Given those two attributes, it doesn’t matter if they are innocent or not. The whole idea is to provide a pleasant, sweet taste. If a sweetener fails to do that and makes your tummy upset, what’s the point of it not having other adverse effects?

Xylitol and sorbitol are dead too, as viable sweeteners.

erythritol

Erythritol has been recently found to increase platelet activity and therefore making blood stickier - a very bad thing indeed for cardiovascular health.

As it is not worth reducing your cellulite (a little bit) only to increase your risk of heart disease (even a little bit), erythritol is unfortunately now out of the question.

Xylitol has also been found to exert the same effect, so this is another reason to dump xylitol.

monk fruit

Monkfruit (Siraitia grosvenorii / Lo Han Guo) seems to be innocuous, at least according to current knowledge, and not cause any serious glucose/insulin fluctuations or GI disturbances.

(Insulin and glucose fluctuations are detrimental to cellulite, as they stimulate the uptake of fat in cellulite fat cells.)

After erythritol been found to increase platelet activity, lo han guo is the only natural sweetener* left to use, IN LIMITED AMOUNTS, and as long as it is not proven detrimental in the future too (the way things go though, I wouldn’t hold my breath on that)…

(* Lo han guo is not authorised as a sweetener in Europe)

Detoxify from the sweet taste and bin natural and artificial sweeteners together with sugar

However, as with “vegan bacon” and vegan “chik’n” and “t’na”, which keep perpetuating in your mind the idea of real bacon and real chicken and real fish whilst you try so hard to be vegan, sweeteners keep you addicted to the sweet taste and inevitably to sugar itself, when you try so hard to be free from the sweet taste.

A much better approach is to bin sugar and sweeteners altogether or at least use them very, very occasionally.

That would be the best thing for overall body health and firm, cellulite-free thighs too.

Is the Use of Artificial Sweeteners Beneficial for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus? The Advantages and Disadvantages of Artificial Sweeteners

  • Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655943/

  • Research paper abstract: Artificial sweeteners have been developed as substitutes for sugar. Sucralose, akesulfame K (ACE K), aspartame, and saccharin are artificial sweeteners. Previously, artificial sweeteners were thought to be effective in treating obesity and diabetes. Human meta-analyses have reported that artificial sweeteners have no effect on body weight or glycemic control. However, recent studies have shown that artificial sweeteners affect glucose absorption in the intestinal tract as well as insulin and incretin secretion in humans and animals. Moreover, artificial sweeteners alter the composition of the microbiota and worsen the glycemic control owing to changes in the gut microbiota. The early intake of ACE K was also shown to suppress the taste response to sugar. Furthermore, a large cohort study showed that high artificial sweetener intake was associated with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular risk, coronary artery disease risk, cerebrovascular risk, and cancer risk. The role of artificial sweeteners in the treatment of diabetes and obesity should be reconsidered, and the replacement of sugar with artificial sweeteners in patients will require the long-term tracking of not only intake but also changes in blood glucose and weight as well as future guidance based on gut bacteria data. To utilise the beneficial properties of artificial sweeteners in treatment, further studies are needed.

Acute responses of stevia and d-tagatose intake on metabolic parameters and appetite/satiety in insulin resistance

  • Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35623816/

  • Research paper abstract: Objective: To examine the effects of d-tagatose or stevia preloads on carbohydrate metabolism markers after an oral glucose load, as well as subjective and objective appetite in women with insulin resistance (IR). Research design and methods: Randomized controlled crossover study. Women with IR without T2DM (n = 33; aged 23.4 ± 3.8; BMI 28.1 ± 3.4 kg × m-2) underwent three oral glucose loads (3 h each) on three different days. Ten min before oral glucose load, volunteers consumed a preload of 60 mL water (control), 60 mL water with stevia (15.3 mg), or d-tagatose (5000 mg). Serum glucose and C-peptide were evaluated at -10, 30-, 60-, 90-, 120-, and 180-min. Subjective appetite was determined with a visual analog scale. Food intake was measured at ad libitum buffet after 180 min. Results: C-peptide iAUC was significantly higher for stevia (median (IQR): 1033 (711-1293) ng × min × L-1) vs. d-tagatose (794 (366-1134) ng × min × L-1; P = 0.001) or control (730 (516-1078) ng × min × L-1; P = 0.012). At 30- and 60-min serum glucose was higher for stevia vs other conditions (P < 0.01). Volunteers reported greater satiety for stevia and d-tagatose vs. control at 60 min and greater desire to eat for stevia vs. control at 120- min (all P < 0.05). Objective appetite did not vary by condition (P = 0.06). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that these NNS are not inert. Stevia intake produced an acute response on C-peptide release while increased serum glucose at earlier times. It is possible that NNS affects subjective but not objective appetite.

Have a skin tightening/cellulite treatment in London with the experts

At LipoTherapeia we have specialised 100% in skin tightening and cellulite reduction for more than two decades and 20,000+ sessions.

This is all we study and practise every day and have researched and tried hands-on all the important skin tightening equipment and their manufacturers.

As strong, deep acting radiofrequency and deep-acting, high-power ultrasound cavitation are the technologies of choice for skin tightening and cellulite reduction, we have invested in the best RF/ultrasound technologies in the world.

Furthermore, over the last two decades we have developed advanced RF and cavitation treatment protocols in order to make the most of our technologies, for maximum results, naturally and safely.

And for even better, faster results, we now combine our RF/ultrasound treatments with high-power red/infrared light LED treatment.

Our radiofrequency/ultrasound/LED treatments are comfortable, pain-free, downtime-free, injection-free, microneedling-free, 99.5%+ safe and always non-invasive.

And our focus is on honest, realistic, science-based treatment, combined with caring, professional service, with a smile.

We will be pleased to see you, assess your cellulite, skin laxity or fibrosis, listen to your story, discuss your case and offer you the best possible treatment.

Learn more, check prices and book an expert cellulite / skin tightening treatment at our London clinic.

Advanced, infrared / blue / red light therapy treatments in London at LipoTherapeia

At LipoTherapeia we are passionate about phototherapy (also known as photobiomodulation/PBM, red light therapy, infrared light therapy, blue light therapy, LED light therapy etc) and we use the most powerful equipment available today (up to 200mW/cm2), for best results and treatment of large body areas.

We use specialised therapy protocols for skin rejuvenation / anti-ageing, pigmentation / post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), moderate/severe acne, skin redness, sensitive/inflamed/irritated skin, wound healing, sports injuries / musculoskeletal pain and overall wellness / well-being.

Our LED phototherapy sessions are comfortable, deeply relaxing and super-safe and are great to enhance our radiofrequency/ultrasound treatments for skin tightening / cellulite reduction.

On our booking page you can book stand-alone phototherapy sessions or combine them with our other treatments, as an add-on.

Learn more or check prices and book an expert LED phototherapy treatment at our London clinic.

The Cellulite School™: Get advanced training in cellulite reduction and skin tightening

Do you want to deeply understand radiofrequency, ultrasound cavitation, LED phototherapy, cellulite and skin tightening?

Attend a half-day, 1-day, 2-day or 3-day one-to-one masterclass and confidently offer your clients the safest, strongest and most effective treatment possible.

Service available via Zoom or at our central London practice.

Learn more or check prices and book training at our London clinic or via Zoom.